ANUNNAKI-TAUGHT KINGS BUILT ANGKOR WAT

by Sasha Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, U.C.L.A.)

Angkor Wat (“Great Temple” or “The God Horus Lives*”), is a square, moated, walled ancient megalithic compound of red sandstone on the floodplains in Northwest Cambodia, just above the Great Lake.  

Causeways over Angkor’s moat, paved in hard sandstone,  are “lined with stone figures who pull a hooded serpent.” 

The inner wall of the temple measures 3,363 feet by 2,625 feet;  the entrance building is 1148 feet long.

The short sides of Angkor’s “five internested rectangular structures align to true south-north, the long sides, to .75 degrees south of east and north of west*.”  

Each side of this walled compound measured nearly a mile long.  

The site features three concentric, consecutive galleries, which paved courtyards separate rise toward the center.

The highest gallery, at the center, capped by a large tower. All together there are nine towers. The area covered by the temple is 5,000 feet by 4,000 feet,  surrounded by moats 623 feet wide.

Legend has it Preah Pisnokar, a part Earthling, part Anunnaki built Angkor Wat.  

Preah’s mother was an ET, one of “the Shining/Glowing ones” (Anunnaki), his father, an Earthling like us.  

When Preah reached adulthood, the Anunnaki took him up into the sky, to the flying palace of Indra (Anu, king of the planet Nibiru, from where our genetic creators came). Aboard the craft, the shining ones taught Preah the technology and techniques of the civilization he was to bring to southeast Asia.  

The Glowing Ones bade Preah build Angkor as a landing platform for their flying craft.

Preah, legend says, poured “magical water onto stone, which made the stone into a concrete which hardened in place as blocks in the structures of Angkor.  

Ankor’s central pyramid pointed to the constellation Draco at sunrise on the spring equinox of 10,500 BC at the same the Egyptian Sphinx gazed at sunrise at Orion.  The Anunnaki goldminers from the planet Nibiru and the Khmer kings they directed created a design of temples around Ankor and Giza as mandalas for aircraft.

Much later (just as the Romans built their temples atop the earlier Sumerian temples at Baalbek, Lebanon) the  Khmer king, Jayavarman II appropriated Angkor in 802 AD and dedicated it to the Indian god Vishnu.  The temple  rose amidst a city the size of Los Angeles.  The temple’s central tower lined up with the point of sunrise on the spring equinox.

In 1177 AD, the Cham of Vietnam defeated the Khmer in a naval battle on the Tonlé Sap lake  but the Khmer Jayavarman VII, a Buddhist, drove the Cham out of Angkor.  

Jayavarman VII build Angkor Thom, a Khmer city the size of Manhattan.  He also, following the grid laid out by the Anunnaki, built Buddhist temples, a reservoir, hospitals, travelers’ rest houses and a network of streets joining all the towns of his empire.  The whole complex of temples by the succession of Khmer kings from 802 AD and 1220 AD exactly mirrored the layout of the stars in the constellation Draco in the north (just as the three pyramids of Giza map Orion).  

In 1177, the Cham of Vietnam defeated the Khmer in a naval battle on the Tonlé Sap lake.  Khmer Jayavarman VII, a Buddhist, drove out the Cham.   He build Angkor Thom, a Khmer city the size of Manhattan Buddhist temples, a reservoir, hospitals, travelers’ rest houses and a network of streets joining all the towns of his empire.  The whole complex of temples by the succession of Khmer kings from 802 AD and 1220 AD exactly mirrored the layout of the stars in the constellation Draco in the north (just as the three pyramids of Giza map Orion).  

Jayavarman VIII, who ruled from 1243–1295 AD broke with Buddhism in favor or the Hindu deity Shiva.  Jayavarman VIII destroyed over 10,000 Buddhist statues and converted Buddhist temples to Hindu temples.     

*Horus, an Anunnaki ruler of ancient Egypt,  is the grandson of Enki, Chief Scientist of the Goldmining Expedition from the planet Nibiru to Earth.  Horus’ father is Osiris, son of Ra-Marduk, who in turn was son of Enki.

Angkor is part of the Anunnaki global grid, and is at 72 degrees longitude “that encode scientifically exact observations of the precession of the equinoxes which proceeds one degree every 72 years.”  See Hancock, G. and Falla, S., 1998, Heaven’s Mirror: 116 -133.

***
March  2014, join Guide Bruce Cunningham and tour mentors Drs. Sasha Lessin and Rita Louise, Janet Kira Lessin and Stephan Knapp for a journey to the ET landing platform, the temple and observatory at Angkor Wat.  

Dr. Lessin will examine Angkor to see if it was used to compress a standing pool beneath the pyramidal structures and vibrate the structure, amplify the vibration with chambers that combine hydrated zinc and hydrochloric acid to release of hydrogen gas exploding upward, capacitated by crystals up through the pyramid to create a microwave.  The microwave would be available to power spacecraft, equipment and light, as Dunn demonstrated for the Giza Pyramid.  

Lessin will also examine water channels and steps at Angkor  for evidence of large-scale gold sifting, as hypothesized by Marshall Klarfeld. 

Register for the tour at http://www.ancientmysteriesinternational.com/registration

 Tour Mentors:

SASHA LESSIN, Ph.D. (U.C.L.A. Anthropology Ph.D.), author of Anunnaki: Gods No More and producer of the hugely popular web site,www.enkispeaks.com studied with the late Zecharia Sitchin, for many years.  Sitichin asked Lessin to create popular internet, book and college-level courses to revise ancient anthropology.

Sitchin asked Dr. Lessin to help disseminate written, graphic and traditional stories of ETs, hithertofore considered mythic “gods” on Earth from 450,000 years ago to 300 B.C. as well as the latest findings in astronomy that relate to the planet Nibiru from which the ETs came to Earth for gold to shield their planet, Nibiru.

JANET KIRA LESSIN, a lifelong scholar of ET contacts and a student of Sitchin as well, is the voice of Ninmah, Chief Medical Officer, Peace Negotiator for the Goldmining Expedition from the planet Nibiru to Earth.  Janet shares wisdom of Ninmah for today’s challenges.

Dr. RITA LOUISE is the host of Just Energy Radio and the Founder of the Institute of Applied Energetics.  She is the author of the books Man-Made: The Chronicles Of Our Extraterrestrial God, Avoiding The Cosmic 2×4, Dark Angels: An Insiders Guide To Ghosts, Spirits & Attached Entities and The Power Within as well as hundreds of articles that have been published worldwide.  She has appeared on radio and television and has spoken at conferences covering topics such as health & healing, ghosts, intuition, ancient mysteries and the paranormal.  For more information about Dr. Rita please visit www.soulhealer.com  or listen to her live at www.justenergyradio.com

STEPHEN KNAPP is the author of more than two dozen books on Vedic Culture and Philosophy including “Proof of Vedic Culture’s Global Influence”.  He has put over forty years of continuous research, Sadhana practice and travel experience (he has visited nearly every state in India) into his books in an effort to share it with those are looking for higher levels of spiritual and cultural understanding.  Stephen is also a free lance photographer and does what he calls photojournalism, capturing the essence of India and spiritual life in practice, which can show the depth of culture.  He has put together a collection of over 18,000 slides of various places, festivals and people of India. Stephen is also the founder of the World Relief Network and is President of the Vedic Friends Association. More on Stephen and his work can be found on:  www.stephen-knapp.com  and  www.vedicfriends.org. His books are available on his website as well as on Amazon.  His knowledge of the ancient Vedic texts like the Mahabharata and Ramayana will make this Angkor tour an experience not to miss!

Source: http://enkispeaks.com/2013/10/21/did-anunnaki-instructed-kings-build-angkor-wat/

The Mysterious Cones of the Egyptian Desert

These strange cones and holes look like a bizarre wind formation in the Egyptian desert, until you see the pattern they make from the air.

Created by Greek artist Danae Stratou and the DAST art team in the mid-1990s, this earthwork art is called "Desert Breath." It covers 100,000 square meters in the Egyptian desert near the Red Sea, and took several years to create. At its center was a fairly deep pool of water, and the whole project was designed to slowly erode over time. Which is exactly what's happened

This is a view of the project via a satellite photo taken shortly after it was created.

And this is what it looks like today. It is eroding beautifully.

For more information, and more photos, check out Stratou's gallery.

Source: http://www.altering-perspectives.com/2013/09/the-mysterious-cones-of-egyptian-desert.html?m=1

Iron beads necklace in Egyptian tomb were forged from meteorite iron, two thousand years before the Iron Age began!

 

Now take a look at this, iron beads made from meteorites found in an Egyptian tomb, and over 5,000 years old. That should be impossible since scientists say no iron items were made before the Iron Age, which started 3,000 years ago, but as we see...scientists are wrong again. These items are evidence of ancient aliens in Egypt who passed on some of their iron making techniques to the locals. SCW

News states:

Ancient Egyptian beads found in a 5,000-year-old tomb were made from iron meteorites that fell to Earth from space, according to a new study. The beads, which are the oldest known iron artifacts in the world, were crafted roughly 2,000 years before Egypt's Iron Age. In 1911, nine tube-shaped beads were excavated from an ancient cemetary near the village of el-Gerzeh, which is located south of Cairo, said study lead author Thilo Rehren, a professor at UCL Qatar, a Western Asian outpost of the University College London's Institute of Archaeology. The tomb dates back to approximately 3200 B.C., the researchers said. Inside the tomb, which belonged to a teenage boy, the iron beads were strung together into a necklace alongside other exotic materials, including gold and gemstones. Early tests of the beads' composition revealed curiously high concentrations of nickel, a telltale signature of iron meteorites.

Source: http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/

 

Big Buried Secrets: Giant Skeletons and the Smithsonian

 

 

The debate over whether The Smithsonian has hidden evidence of “giants” in American prehistory continues to be torn apart by proponents from both “believer” and “skeptic” camps. Yet sadly, there is a question underlying the debate that is far bigger than even the largest giant skeleton.

The question has long been asked: have giant skeletons been discovered throughout the Americas, and if so, is the Smithsonian Institute in Washington actively seeking to cover up those discoveries?
Admittedly, while there is actually some legitimate historical information that may have to do with discoveries of this kind (which we will examine shortly), in modern times we would be hard pressed to explain why there are so few–if any–credible specimens that appear to depict humanoids of large enough proportions to qualify for being actual giants, let alone those which are kept from public view for clandestine reasons. The obvious skeptical assumption would be that this is simply because no such specimens exist. However, this lack of evidence, in the mind of the more conspiracy-minded among us, has more to do with a vast coverup than the actual non-existence of giants in ancient times.
A number of researchers have argued that evidence for this can be found within a minority of “credible” cases that exist mostly in nineteenth century newspaper articles. Herein, of course, lies a big part of the problem: obviously, while we cannot rule out as hoaxes every instance where a newspaper reported the discovery of large, seemingly human remains prior to the 1930s, we must acknowledge nonetheless that journalists took much greater liberties with the facts in those days. Newspaper hoaxes were actually very common in the nineteenth century, with renowned writers the likes of Mark Twain even admitting to the use of journalism hoaxes for politically-driven satire. If anything, even the “good” reports of anomalous remains that turn up in old newspaper accounts should be taken with more than just a grain of salt.

Mysteries of the ancient past… explored with the understanding of today. Feeling lucky? Go ahead… take a ride, and click here.

This point was brought up in a recent blog by skeptical researcher Jason Colavito, who took a shot at tackling the mystery of giant skeleton conspiracies and the Smithsonian Institute by exposing what he sees as the faulty logic of the conspiracy argument:

The “reports”—from old newspapers—are assumed true [by conspiracy theorists], so the fact that no such remains exist (or ever existed) at the Smithsonian is now proof of a cover-up. The claim that the Smithsonian had the skeletons of giants, incidentally, does not appear in the literature of the nineteenth century, when these giant bones were allegedly consigned to the museum; presumably, the Biblical literalists of the day would have made as much of them as they did of the Cardiff Giant, and yet it was not so. In fact, as early as 1865 the Smithsonian published a document by Ducrotay de Blainville, following Cuvier, attributing “giant” humanoid bones to mastodons.

Colavito goes on to note that there “should be some record in the Smithsonian materials of these alleged bones,” particularly during a period in history like the mid-to-late nineteenth century, when belief in the existence of giants might have been taken for granted. “I find it interesting that I can track down no claim of missing giant bones from the Smithsonian,” Covalito concludes, “until the rise of the modern creationist and alternative history movements in the middle twentieth century, when suddenly Victorian yellow journalism became proof of biblical truths.”

Colavito is correct in asserting that there are no indications in the historic record where large “anomalous skeletons” have gone missing from the Smithsonian. However, as we shall soon see, this does not mean that such gigantic remains were never found at all.

In contrast, one commenter on Covalito’s post, Eric Johns, offered an example from 1911, where researchers named Pugh and Hart had found the remains of large, red haired humans at Sunset Cave close to Lovelock, Nevada. The remains found there were said to be between 6.5 and just over seven feet tall, and some of the remains were shipped to the Smithsonian Institute by L.L. Loud, an archaeologist with the University of California, one year later.”These notes are still on digital file at the Hearst Museum of Anthropology,” Johns shared, “listed under reference number 544, An Anthropological Expedition of 1913.” But interestingly, Pugh and Hart, while releasing the majority of the remains to the Smithsonian, also managed to keep a number of the strange artifacts and bones they found, including several skulls, which Johns says remain today at the Humboldt Museum in Winnemucca, Nevada. The boxes obtained by the Smithsonian, however, cannot be accounted for so easily:

[The University of California] seems to have misplaced the skeletons, yet the other material is still there and on display in their exhibits. The same can be said of the Smithsonian, who still use some of Loud’s artifacts for their Southwest exhibit at the National Museum of the American Indian. Again, no giant skeletons to be found in their exhibits or catalog.

Responding to John’s comment, Colavito wrote:
If 6.5 feet is a “giant,” that makes my grandfather, at 6’6″, Goliath. While unusual for their era, these sizes are not unheard of for human beings and are therefore neither shocking nor supernatural.

The skeptic in me would agree with Covalito that, indeed, it is not impossible (or even all that unordinary) in modern times to find a person of similar stature to the “giants” discussed by Johns in his commentary. Maybe this wouldn’t necessarily constitute an “anomaly” to assume such persons existed in America several hundreds of years or more ago.

However, debating whether the size of these specimens fits the criteria for being “giants” or not is an exercise that misses the greater point entirely: that an independent museum managed to maintain record of the remains discovered at Sunset Cave, while the Smithsonian and University of California apparently did not. Had the folks on the receiving end of this odd shipment to the Smithsonian simply been exercising extreme incompetence, or was there some other reason for the “loss” of certain parts of the shipment? This case wouldn’t have to involve human remains of large stature in order call into question why the Smithsonian would misplace portions of the batch shipment, while maintaining others for display. In other words, the mystery has as much to do with the misplacement of a discovery as it does the claims of “giant” bodies being what were actually uncovered.
Also, most modern skeptics would likely look at the rather unimpressive estimated height of 6’6″ skeletons in the Pugh and Hart case, and use this as an argument against the existence of giants in American prehistory altogether. At very least, they might use it to bolster the assertion that conspiracy theorists, creationists, and the downright gullible simply exaggerate the details of “giant” discoveries, so as to cater better to the fantastic stories that such “researchers” would seek to promote.

Colavito is right to assert that a 6’6″ individual is “neither shocking nor supernatural.” He is probably right again when he states that he could find no mention of missing giant bones in the nineteenth century, thus suggesting that the conspiracy assertions are a more recent phenomenon.
What cannot be denied, however, are the historical discoveries of giant skeletons much larger than those discovered at Sunset Cave in 1911. Records for these discoveries still exist today, and are available in the public record, along with detailed descriptions. But these accounts won’t be found in any questionable newspaper accounts from more than a century ago, or even in the hearsay and speculation of the finest alternative history buffs. Instead, what may be the very best evidence of curiously large skeletons from America’s past were published more than a century ago by the very target of the so-called conspiracies: The Smithsonian Institute.

In the Twelfth Annual Report from the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian, published in 1894, Cyrus Thomas and Thomas Powell of the Bureau of Ethnology wrote of several discoveries where large, seemingly human skeletal remains were found. The first we’ll examine here was discovered in Roane County, Tennessee:

“Underneath [a] layer of shells the earth was very dark and appeared to be mixed with vegetable mold to the depth of 1 foot. At the bottom of this, resting on the original surface of the ground, was a very large skeleton lying horizontally at full length. Although very soft, the bones were sufficiently distinct to allow of careful measurement before attempting to remove them. The length from the base of the skull to the bones of the toes was found to be 7 feet 3 inches. It is probable, therefore, that this individual when living was fully 7½ feet high.”

Often, such accounts end up being fabrications or portions of text that are taken grossly out of context. Hence, I decided to see if any scans of the original published report could be found online for download. Indeed, the entire Twelfth Annual Report from the Smithsonian’s Bureau of Ethnology can be found online at Archive.org, with a PDF version here that can be viewed freely in its entirety. The relevant portion from the excerpt above can be found on page 362, and is pictured below:

Another instance occurs in the same report, this time at presumed Indian burial mounds at Dunlieth, Illinois:

“Near the original surface, 10 or 12 feet from the center, on the lower side, lying at full length on its back, was one of the largest skeletons discovered by the Bureau agents, the length as proved by actual measurement being between 7 and 8 feet. It was clearly traceable, but crumbled to pieces immediately after removal from the hard earth in which it was encased….”

Page 115 of the printed report features the relevant text:


Indeed, it seems that the Smithsonian at one time did discover and document what could only be called “giants,” during the same period that many of the American newspapers were reporting similar stories. Whether this bolsters the legitimacy of those reports may still be questionable; however, few would argue that trained scientists the likes of Powell and Thomas–despite the allegations of coverups and conspiracies–likely knew what they were talking about when they took these measurements, and reported on the existence of humans that, when alive, would easily have stood taller than seven feet.

Also, it should be noted that in the latter of the two cases, it states that the skeleton “crumbled to pieces” when attempts were made to remove portions of the body. Hence, the reason in this instance for why the Smithsonian would possess no remains in their record seems clear: they weren’t able to retrieve a skeleton at all, since the discovery was too fragile to remove from the site. In other words, while the Smithsonian has actually acknowledged finding such large skeletons, there may be legitimate reasons as to why no bones were ever recovered in some instances.

That isn’t to say that this scenario is always the case, however. Further complicating the mystery of missing giant bones is the following excerpt from an article I wrote several years ago, which included the inquiries of the late zoologist Ivan T. Sanderson, along with his frustrations with what appeared to include more allegations of evasive attitudes by the Smithsonian:

“Sometime in the 1960s, Sanderson wrote about an odd letter he received regarding an engineer who, during World War II, had been stationed on the Aleutian island of Shemya. While building an airstrip, the bulldozing of a group of hills in the area led the engineer and his crew to unearth several sedimentary layers of human remains. They noted the extraordinary length of the crania and leg bones at the site, having apparently belonged to people of gigantic proportions. The skulls were said to have measured up to 24 inches from base to crown, far greater than the length of an average human skull. Also of interest was that each was said to have been trepanned, the strange process of drilling or cutting a hole and removing a top center portion of the skull, thought by some ancient cultures to enable a variety of alleged “benefits”, including psychicabilities, etc. Sanderson actively began to search for more proof of this incident, and later was able to contact another member of the unit who he said confirmed the bizarre story. By all accounts, the remains were said to have been gathered by the Smithsonian Institution, but no record of where they were taken was ever issued. Sanderson seemed convinced that the institute did indeed retrieve them however, going so far as to ask ‘is it that these people cannot face rewriting all the textbooks?’ “

Of course, when it comes to good science, few would argue the difference between hard evidence, and a really good story. The 1894 Bureau of Ethnology report provides us with historical documentation by agents with the Smithsonian for the discovery of large, anomalous bones that appeared to be human, and on at least two instances. Stories like that of Sanderson and the Sunset Cave discovery of 1911 suggest the discovery, as well as the potential mishandling, of otherwise precious bits of information about ancient America. And yet, none of these “stories,” whether told by independent researchers, or agents like Dr. Cyrus Thomas, really provide us with a complete specimen: if one good, complete giant skeleton were known to exist in its entirety, which scientists today could openly study and discuss with the public, there would be little need for discussion of a conspiracy.

Of course, the knowledge that such skeletons may indeed have been found at times, paired with the Smithsonian’s apparent inability to keep very good records about their discovery, no doubt helps to fuel the conspiratorial speculation. With all the unknown quantities present here (and whether they are largely fact, or merely fiction), at times it does become difficult to know whether the entire truth is really being told.

Regardless, do such discoveries of giant bones that are known to have existed, as the 1894 report seems to indicate, further lend to the claims of the conspiracy theorists? Or do they merely point to a deeper level of the mystery that has yet to be explored… and something which may contain new keys to life in ancient America?

UPDATE: Over the last few days, feedback from most readers indicates that they have interpreted, correctly, that the assertions made in the article above point to there being less likelihood that any actual “conspiracy” is afoot regarding Smithsonian acquisition of various skeletal remains, particularly those of large stature that were recovered in the late 1800s. This, I feel, remains true, despite the evidence of genuine discoveries of interest in the Smithsonian records (and whether or not one chooses to label these as actual “giants” or not, as even a 7-8 foot tall human, while uncommon, is hardly impossible). However, one of the bloggers mentioned in the piece above, Jason Colavito, misinterpreted this premise (albeit honestly, I feel), and has expounded on the piece with his own article that alleges I have contributed to the conspiracy mythos. This is not the viewpoint I have intended to express here, instead gravitating toward skeptical neutrality on the issue; however, I recommend that folks take a fair look at his article nonetheless, as it may provide a useful alternative perspective on the discussion, as well as its ideological components:

Jason Colavito on “Micah Hanks and the Smithsonian Anti-Giant Conspiracy”