http://sitsshow.blogspot.nl/2015/07/us-government-releases-document-with.html
Posts tonen met het label Government. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Government. Alle posts tonen
woensdag 22 juli 2015
dinsdag 29 april 2014
Men In Black
5:51 PM
Q.Thank you for the giving of your gift. On a subject that has been around for years.. Men in Black. Are they real?
A. When I first think of Men in Black, I see images of people both protecting alien work, and also protecting and cover aliens that walk amongst us. When I think about their work, I get a sense of being underground, the exterior looks like a rocky mountain and you enter what looks like a cave, but then after you go so far back it takes on this medical like, sterile environment. And what is strange is I see certain aliens being use in experiments as if they are being dissected and trying to be understood, how they work...some look to be dissected at just a normal temperature, but then others take on this frosty appearance as if they have been frozen, but when they come out of being frozen it looks like some kind of steam is released from them before the experiments can continue. It is like their inner core remains warm, but their outer shell is frozen.
If I were to describe the aliens, in some sense I want to call them a grasshopper. They look taller than the average human, probably 7-8 ft in height total. Dark skinned, like dark grey or black, they have two thick antennas on their head that are almost like horns, they have two flaps on the back of their head as if that is where hair would be. Their bodies are lean, very thin like no fat on them at all. I get this sense from looking at their back that they could fly, it looks like a shell on their back, like a very streamlined turtle shell that knows how to split apart and that is what they use to fly. Their arms are boney, they look to have three long fingers and a thumb, and their feet are like three toes and a thumb. I get a sense that they can use their hands and feet for the same functions.
The ones that they are working on have no clothes. Humans are working on them, the humans are the men in black.
Q. Who are they?
A. First I get the phrase "Men in Black" really is untrue because a lot of the men in black underground really wear a white lab coat, like I hear laughing about that like it is funny. Then I get that the MIB above ground that work with and help to disguise aliens above ground, are highly intelligent, but most take on a very mundane appearance, and then I see like this beach bum with a knitted hat on. 
I feel like I want to go back to that underground scene....because one odd thing that I keep focusing on is not only are these MIB working on aliens to understand them better, but it like different alien species are working with the MIB as well...And then I see a Jim Henson muppet that looks like a grey walking around in a lab coat, and I just get a sense that not only do we or they try to understand the aliens, but other aliens work with us to so that we can understand each other. I feel like the ones that are nice to humans are allowed to walk more free or at least in disguise, but the ones that have a negative outlook on humans are the ones that they stop, referring to the MIB, and I feel like these "grasshopper" for lack of a better work, aliens, have a very malicious undertone and part of the experiment is to try to figure out why they are that way. Like something in their brain is underdeveloped or...they lack a piece of their brain that hold emotion or feelings. And it looks like other aliens are just as curious as what we are and that is why they help us, because they have the superior technology as well and they teach us about their technology as we conduct these experiments on other aliens.
Q. Where do they come from if not from Earth?
A. I see the MIB like a, i want to say secrete society, but for good. Some are human, some are alien with a human shell, and some are a hybrid of both. The thing is I do not see the alien part of the MIB being unique to only one species. I feel like there are like 10 different species intermingled in this.
Q. Who runs the show?
A. I want to say something like....lucar...L U C A R. And I can describe him, he looks tall probably 7 feet tall, he is thin, I feel like his skin would be like a frog, and he gave me a weird look when I said that, not angry just strange...He has pointy ears, he almost always uses telepathy to talk, he knows how to speak but then he is like why would you do that if you did not have to. It is so much easier to think your thoughts. He has like a wide flat nose, I almost feel like I could look up his nostrils by just staring straight at him, he has like brownish-green eyes, and that is really mostly what I see, I am stuck on his face.
Q. Are they aliens monitoring earth's activities?
A. I get that they do monitor earth, but more than the materialistic things, the thing that is very troubling is like how people in society treat each other, and then I get some message about...when humans were created, they were given the gift of...like emotion and empathy and feelings, but yet we treat each other horribly and we do not use these beautiful gifts that we were given. It is like they are saying we should be ashamed of that, because many of the aliens are envious of that, referring to the gifts, because those gifts are things that they to used to have but they sort of lost that as they spiritually evolved, and what they have are memories of how that felt, but they cannot experience those same feelings anymore.
Q. Do they appear in other countries besides our own?
A. I get that they are all over the world, but there are just some locations that have a higher concentration, and then I get that all over the entire world there might only be 250 of these MIB.
Q. How do they know to show up in a certain place at a certain time?
A. I get that most, but not all of the MIB, are able to talk mentally to one another, therefore if a situation even has a certain feel about it, it is like they are so connected that they can mentally explain what is going on and if need be, be able to respond.
Q. Can you give an example of a situation in which they would need to respond?
A. What I see happening is MIB who was walking down a street, he sees some kind of a robbery or something happening, and they walk over to where this situation was going down to see if they could help or see what was happening, I get a sense that they are not fearful, and when the police arrive they start asking a lot of question to the Man in Black, and he is trying to be polite and police want to take him to the station for a report. And for some reason, his counterparts who were tuned into this situation did not want that to happen, and if feels like out of nowhere these guys in a black SUV show up and it almost looks like a scene from a movie, because they jump out of the SUV, they flash their badges at the cop and they say we got it from here, and they take the Man in Black and leave. Then the cop looks completely dumbfounded, almost like some kind of a Jedi Mind trick was pulled on him. Then I see inside the SUV and it looked like the two men that came to the rescue were scolding the guy, and just said you have to be more careful. It is like they are so obvious about their existence, but yet discrete. And then I hear the phrase "That they hide in plain sight"
Q. What are their day to day duties?
A. The image I get is of superman, and then I see it is like they are pretending to be normal people, with normal jobs, but they always choose jobs that they can seem to disappear if need be. And then it is like they do this undercover covert stuff on the side.
Q. Is the president aware of these MIB, and in what time were humans included in this secret society?
A. I get that the president is aware, and he has even met some of them, and I get that he is actually a little scared of them. They have never given him a reason to be intimidated, but they feel he is intimidated, as far a humans, I get that humans were accepted when aliens bread with us.
Q. How long ago?
A. I am getting a picture of a 5K sign so I would say 5000 years ago.
Q. How are they recruited?
A. I don't know the message I get is you don't find us, we find you, which feels vague, but I feel I am blocked from knowing how they do it. It feels like it has something to do with your dreams. I see a person sleeping, and they have those thought bubbles above their head, and it feels that they are tapped into those dream thoughts.
Q. Are they time travelers from the future, if so why?
A. The said that the future, is a term that humans made up....but really the past, present, and future are happening simultaneously, and the MIB call of it time. It is just relative to what you're viewing perspective is, so there really is no future. per se.
6:38 PM
Strange comment I found when searching for images for this blog.
Unless you're a 4 dimensional being just like the one in MIB III and can exist in all times, past, present and future simultaneously
donderdag 27 maart 2014
Benjamin Fulford March 25, 2014 Talks on creating peaceful world village proceeding smoothly despite ongoing cabal threats
There has been hectic activity both on and below the surface this
past week as negotiations on how to upgrade the worlds’ economic and
political structures enter the final stretch. Under the surface, the
Chinese, the gnostic illuminati, the British, the Europeans, the
Military Industrial Complex and others have been in touch with the White
Dragon Society to outline where they have drawn lines in the sand.
On the surface, the Israeli government has ordered all of its
embassies shut down, there is an ongoing attempt to start a new cold war
and the UN has been making veiled threats of unleashing nuclear terror.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/23/us-israel-diplomacy-idUSBREA2M0ER20140323
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/moldova/10717260/Russian-troops-poised-to-run-into-Moldova-Nato-commander-warns.html
http://rt.com/news/iaea-dirty-bomb-terrorists-493/
Under the surface, the same group that predicted in advance the
events in the Ukraine and a US military move against China (the missing
Malaysian plane) told the WDS the next moves will be “false flag
incidents in Malaysia and Indonesia followed by the shutting down of 12
US electric grids and a renewed attempt to start World War III.” This
can be seen as a sort of table pounding tactic aimed at affecting the
ongoing negotiations.
On a more positive note, a representative of a group calling itself
“Cobra resistance,” met with the WDS in Tokyo to negotiate an alliance
between Europe and Asia.
This coincides with the ongoing visit to Europe by Chinese president Xi Jinping where he is meeting with the G7 heads of state and with senior members of the committee of 300.
http://english.cntv.cn/program/newsupdate/20140323/101730.shtml
One of the proposals on the table calls for replacing the 5 permanent
members of the United Nations Security Council, the United States,
Russia, France, England and China with a council of eight. The
councilors or elders would represent Africa, America (North and South),
China, East Asia excluding China, Europe (including Russia), India, the
Islamic world and global first nations. Under this proposal each area
would have a veto over anything that affects their own region.
Although the details remain to be settled, there appears to be no
major objections to the broad outlines of this proposal. There is also a
lot of support for replacing a flawed democracy featuring brainwashed
voters, media manipulation, bribes and electoral theft with meritocracy
combined with genuine real time democracy.
The issue of what to do about the Federal Reserve Board and the European central banking remains the biggest bone of contention.
Here there is a broad agreement that the internationally traded US
dollar needs to become a separate currency from any new Treasury bill
issued by the Republic of the United States of America. This would allow
the Republic to invest almost unlimited amounts of government money
inside the United States without devaluing the internationally held US
dollars. It would also allow the US physical economy to be competitive
again. The only people objecting to this, of course, are the families
that own the current US dollar regime who would rather continue as they
are and wait for American living standards to fall to third world
levels.
Regardless of what happens with the US, the WDS pointed out to the
European representative that the Europeans could independently issue
their own government currency, backed by the material economy of Europe,
without any need to rely on Asian gold. It was also explained to them
that government money was a far better alternative than privately owned
European Central Bank debt notes called “Euros.”
Once the European and North American peoples are freed from
Babylonian style debt slavery, they will experience a renaissance unlike
any the world has seen before.
The Asians, with all their gold, will of course be in a position to
invest generously and gain influence around world, regardless of whether
or not the Europeans and Americans issue their own independent regional
currencies.
Meanwhile, as a back drop to these discussions, ominous occult
messages and threats are being sent out by the dying cabal. As mentioned
at the top, the Israelis have shut down all their embassies and their
ambassadors and top staff have gone to underground shelters.
This message also arrived from a source that has the ability to hack
my mobile phone: “The upcoming UN broadcast discusses destruction by
fire, the cleansing of the Earth and Lucifer’s coming teacher.” The date
for this was put as somewhere between April 14th and April 21st.
The “Cobra” representative said he had independently heard the same
date mentioned and said it has significant occult Astrological meaning.
However, he said that if enough people were able to think positively
instead of negatively about the event it would become a good thing
instead of another mass casualty event.
In any case, since the world’s largest military organizations do not
support the cabalists it is believed their threats are now mostly empty.
According to the P2 lodge, even president Obama is no longer siding
with the cabalists and the problem was restricted to a few Washington,
New York and Israel based Satan worshipping gangsters. These people will
not be around much longer and many have already vanished.
As mentioned above, Chinese President Xi Jinping is now in Holland as
part of a mostly Northern European tour. He will meet with Barack Obama
and the heads of the G7 there. While Obama and Xi are in Europe,
Obama’s wife, mother in law and daughters are in China. Although
everybody is too polite to say so, it seems to be they are there as
hostages to ensure President Xi’s safety while in Europe.
Obama will also be meeting with the pope as well as organizing a
meeting between Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan and president Park
Gyeun-hye of South Korea no doubt to discuss North Korea’s push to
reunify the Korean peninsula.
The other ongoing push is to create a moderate Islamic Caliphate and
to end the attempt by the Zionist/Nazis to start a war between radical
Muslim brotherhood regimes and Christian countries. The latest move here
has been the announcement by Egypt that it will execute 529 members of
the Muslim Brotherhood.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/10718387/Egypt-court-sentences-529-Muslim-Brotherhood-members-to-death.html
The brotherhood is also being purged from Syria, Saudi Arabia, the
United Arab Emirates and other countries in the region. Moderate Islam
has finally had enough and is fighting back.
The interesting point about most of the links in this story,
especially about the radical changes in the Middle East, is that they
originate with UK based media companies. The American corporate
propaganda media is trying to pretend this is not happening. This is a
clear indication England has broken free from cabal control.
In any case, in addition to the meeting with the European
representative, the WDS will be meeting Chinese, Russian, North Korean
and Gnostic Illuminati representatives this week as part of an ongoing
effort to ensure that global harmony will soon replace global debt
slavery.
Source: http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.nl/2014/03/benjamin-fulford-march-25-2014-talks-on.html
woensdag 12 februari 2014
New studies: Conspiracy theorists sane; government dupes crazy, hostile
February 11, 2014 - Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled conspiracy theorists appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.
The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories, the study compared conspiracist (pro-conspiracy theory) and conventionalist (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.
The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories, the study compared conspiracist (pro-conspiracy theory) and conventionalist (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.
The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist. In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.
Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: The research showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.
Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.
In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.
Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called conspiracists or conspiracy theorists.
Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people dont like being called conspiracy theorists: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! The CIAs campaign to popularize the term conspiracy theory and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.
In other words, people who use the terms conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorist as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.
DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved state crimes against democracy. An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the Kennedy assassinations in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.
Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed conspiracy theory label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.
In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong confirmation bias - that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the conspiracy theory label) to avoid conflicting information.
The extreme irrationality of those who attack conspiracy theories has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled Dangerous Machinery: Conspiracy Theorist as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion, they wrote:
If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.
But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIAs 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the conspiracy theory smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous - and more rational - than anti-conspiracy ones.
No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.
Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: The research showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.
Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.
In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.
Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called conspiracists or conspiracy theorists.
Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people dont like being called conspiracy theorists: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! The CIAs campaign to popularize the term conspiracy theory and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.
In other words, people who use the terms conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorist as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.
DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved state crimes against democracy. An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the Kennedy assassinations in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.
Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed conspiracy theory label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.
In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong confirmation bias - that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the conspiracy theory label) to avoid conflicting information.
The extreme irrationality of those who attack conspiracy theories has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled Dangerous Machinery: Conspiracy Theorist as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion, they wrote:
If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.
But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIAs 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the conspiracy theory smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous - and more rational - than anti-conspiracy ones.
No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.
maandag 28 oktober 2013
woensdag 7 augustus 2013
New U.S. spying revelations coming from Snowden leaks: journalist
By Anthony Boadle
BRASILIA (Reuters) - Glenn Greenwald, the American journalist who published documents leaked by fugitive former U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden, plans to make new revelations "within the next 10 days or so" on secret U.S. surveillance of the Internet.
"The articles we have published so far are a very small part of the revelations that ought to be published," Greenwald on Tuesday told a Brazilian congressional hearing that is investigating the U.S. internet surveillance in Brazil.
"There will certainly be many more revelations on spying by the U.S. government and how they are invading the communications of Brasil and Latin America," he said in Portuguese.
The Rio de Janeiro-based columnist for Britain's Guardian newspaper said he has recruited the help of experts to understand some of the 15,000 to 20,000 classified documents from the National Security Agency that Snowden passed him, some of which are "very long and complex and take time to read."
Greenwald told Reuters he does not believe the pro-transparency website WikiLeaks had obtained a package of documents from Snowden, and that only he and filmmaker Laura Poitras have complete archives of the leaked material.
Greenwald said Snowden, who was in hiding in Hong Kong before flying to Russia in late June, was happy to leave a Moscow airport after being granted temporary asylum, and pleased that he had stirred up a worldwide debate on internet privacy and secret U.S. surveillance programs used to monitor emails.
"I speak with him a lot since he left the airport, almost every day. We use very strong encryption to communicate," Greenwald told the Brazilian legislators. "He is very well."
"He is very pleased with the debate that is arising in many countries around the world on internet privacy and U.S. spying. It is exactly the debate he wanted to inform," Greenwald said.
After a meeting in June with Snowden in Hong Kong, Greenwald published in The Guardian the first of many reports that rattled the U.S. intelligence community by disclosing the breadth and depth of alleged NSA surveillance of telephone and internet usage.
Last month, in an article co-authored by Greenwald, the Brazilian newspaper O Globo reported that the NSA spied on Latin American countries with programs that can monitor billions of emails and phone calls for suspicious activity. Latin American countries fumed at what they considered a violation of their sovereignty and demanded explanations and an apology.
COMMERCIAL SECRETS
In Brazil, the largest U.S. trading partner in South America, angry senators questioned President Dilma Rousseff's planned state visit to Washington in October and a billion-dollar purchase of U.S.-made fighter jets Brazil is considering.
Members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee peppered Greenwald with questions on Tuesday, such as whether the NSA was capable of spying on Brazil's commercial secrets, including the discovery of promising offshore oil reserves, and the communications of the country's president and armed forces.
Greenwald had no details on specific targets and said the documents did not name telecommunications and internet companies in the United States and Brazil that might have collaborated with the NSA's collection of internet users' data.
The journalist said Snowden planned to stay in Moscow "as long as he needs to, until he can secure his situation." He said Snowden knew he ran the risk of spending the rest of his life in jail or being hunted by the most powerful nation in the world, but had no doubts about his decision to leak the documents on the U.S. surveillance programs.
Greenwald criticized governments around the world for failing to offer Snowden protection, even while they publicly denounced the U.S. surveillance of their citizens' internet usage.
Meanwhile, Washington is working through diplomatic channels to persuade governments to stop complaining about the surveillance programs, he said.
"The Brazilian government is showing much more anger in public than it is showing in private discussions with the U.S. government," Greenwald told reporters. "All governments are doing this, even in Europe."
In a speech at the United Nations on Tuesday, Brazilian Foreign Minister Antonio Patriota called the interception of telecommunications and acts of espionage in Latin America "a serious issue, with a profound impact on the international order." But he did not mention the United States by name.
(Editing by Paul Simao)
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/u-spying-revelations-coming-snowden-leaks-journalist-004803266.html
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)