dinsdag 18 februari 2014

Swiss scientists say they can prove beyond a doubt that the Lost City of Atlantis was on Mars, and its astronauts traded with ancient Egypt for a significant period of time!

Swiss scientists say they can prove beyond a doubt that the Lost City of Atlantis was on Mars, and its astronauts traded with ancient Egypt for a significant period of time!

Resized-DU6ZC

Even more incredible, they claim to have the evidence to show that the legendary King Tut died spectacularly in a space shuttle crash with an alien crew.
“The Martian Civilization destroyed itself or was destroyed by a meteor while Egypt was still in its prime,” Dr. Stephan Weisz told a gathering of reporters and scientists in Bern, Switzerland.
But the inhabitants left their mark both on Earth and Mars. Top secret photographs taken by America’s Martian probes clearly show the remains of temples on the surface of the planet.


“Egypt’s pyramids and the ability to mummify the human body are definitely the result of technologies that originated not on Earth but someplace else, in this case Mars. It is our belief that the Atlantans traded these technologies to the Egyptians for gold.”
Dr. Weisz and a colleague, Egyptologist Conrad Vetsch, said that a recently deciphered Egyptian scroll first led them to believe that Atlantis was located on Mars. The scroll describes a technologically advanced civilization existing beyond our own planet “in the vast, black ocean of space.”
It also alludes to space travel and the use of a shuttle craft to ferry manlike extraterrestrials from a space-bound mother ship to the surface of Earth.

Resized-F7QAKResized-HLPFL

“Researchers have long known that the Egyptians were exposed to flight because an elaborate model of what they called a glider was found in Tut’s tomb,” Dr. Weisz told the group.

Resized-HXYGG

Not everyone attending the conference agreed with the experts’ theories. Dr. Seth Rausch, a German historian, thinks they went too far in calling the Martian civilization Atlantis.
“I don’t doubt that the Egyptians were in contact with extraterrestrials,” said the expert. “But until we actually inspect the ruins on Mars, there is no way to know if they are the remains of Atlantis.”
“In my opinion, if Atlantis did exist, it existed here on Earth.”
Norwegian astronomer Elling Gade agreed. “Atlantis might have been the colony of an alien civilization. But it most definitely was located on this planet,” he said.
How come none of these scientists were surprised about temples on Mars? How come these scientists seemed to know of scripts that possibly prove the inter action of ancient Egypt and aliens?
What else is it that the scientific elite are aware of, that we are not? Why is it that they think our history, and things that may determine who we are, are none of our concern? Or, is it just that they think the more secrets they have, the more important they are?



Source: http://theviralpost.com/atlantis-was-on-mars-ancient-egypt-traded-with-them/

vrijdag 14 februari 2014

EU plan om spaartegoeden van 500 miljoen burgers te confisqueren

eu commissieEerst werd gedacht dat Reuters een slechte grap wilde uithalen met een artikel genaamd: “Europese beleidsmakers overwegen spaargelden te gebruiken om financieringsruimte te bieden”, maar na enkele uren zonder reactie moest erkend worden dat het helaas waar is.
Helaas, want alles waarvoor gewaarschuwd  werd met de opmerking “Er kan alleen op een pijnlijke manier uit de crisis gekomen worden” en alles wat de spaarders en burgers van Cyprus hebben moeten doormaken, lijkt op het punt te staan in alle Europese lidstaten doorgevoerd te gaan worden.

Onvrijwillig

Om kort te gaan kunnen de woorden van Reuters als volgt worden samengevat: “De spaartegoeden van 500 miljoen Europese burgers kunnen worden ingezet om lange termijn investeringen te financieren en zodoende de economie te stimuleren. Op deze wijze kan het financieringsgat gedicht worden die de banken sinds de financiële crisis hebben laten ontstaan”, aldus een EU document. Wat er niet bij wordt verteld is, dat het spaargeld op een puur onvrijwillige basis zal worden aangewend en kan dus het best omschreven worden als een confiscatie.

Explosief

De bron van deze ‘knaller’ is een document dat Reuters heeft ingezien waarin wordt beschreven hoe de Europese Commissie op zoek is naar manieren om de 28 Europese lidstaten minder afhankelijk te maken van bankfinancieringen voor bedrijven, infrasstruturele projecten en andere investeringen. Europa erkent hier dus mee dat de ECB van Mario Draghi niet in staat is geweest om de al vijf jaar verstopte monetaire leidingen te ontstoppen. Het commissie verslag geeft eindelijk toe dat de economische en financiële crisis het vermogen van de banken om fondsen vrij te maken voor de reële economie heeft geschaad. Dit geldt in het bijzonder voor de lange termijn investeringen.
Du,s afgezien van dit alles kan gesteld worden dat de financiële situatie in Europa, in ieder geval wat betreft de Europese Commissie is geregeld!


Source: http://www.gewoon-nieuws.nl/2014/02/eu-plan-om-spaartegoeden-van-500-miljoen-burgers-te-confisqueren/#.Uv3j-KO3PJt

donderdag 13 februari 2014

DNA Analysis Of Paracas Elongated Skulls Released. The Results Prove They Were Not fully Homo sapiens

February 6, 2014

Paracas is a desert peninsula located within the Pisco Province in the Ica Region, on the south coast of Peru. It is here were Peruvian archaeologist, Julio Tello, made an amazing discovery in 1928, a massive and elaborate graveyard containing tombs filled with the remains of individuals with the largest elongated skulls found anywhere in the world. 


These have come to be known as the 'Paracas skulls'. In total, Tello found more than 300 of these elongated skulls, which are believed to date back around 3,000 years. 
A DNA analysis has now been conducted on one of the skulls and expert Brien Foerster has released preliminary information regarding these enigmatic skulls. It is well-known that most cases of skull elongation are the result of cranial deformation, head flattening, or head binding, in which the skull is intentionally deformed by applying force over a long period of time. 
It is usually achieved by binding the head between two pieces of wood, or binding in cloth. However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of a regular human skull. The Paracas skulls, however, are different.


Wikipedia Commons

The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. 
They also contain only one parietal plate, rather than two. The fact that the skulls' features are not the result of cranial deformation means that the cause of the elongation is a mystery, and has been for decades.

Mr. Juan Navarro, owner and director of the local museum, called the Paracas History Museum, which houses a collection of 35 of the Paracas skulls, allowed the taking of samples from 5 of the skulls. 
The samples consisted of hair, including roots, a tooth, skull bone and skin, and this process was carefully documented via photos and video. The samples were sent to the late Lloyd Pye, founder of the Starchild Project, who delivered the samples to a geneticist in Texas for DNA testing.   
The results are now back, and Brien Foerster, author of more than ten books and an authority on the ancient elongated headed people of South America, has just revealed the preliminary results of the analysis. He reports on the geneticist's findings:

"It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans."

The implications are huge. "I am not sure it will even fit into the known evolutionary tree," Foerster wrote. He added that if the Paracas individuals were so biologically different, they would not have been able to interbreed with humans.

The results need to be replicated and more analysis undertaken before final conclusions can be drawn.
Source: ADG (UK) via Paracas History Museum / Brian Foerster Interview

Source: http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/dna-analysis-of-paracas-elongated-skulls-released-the-results-prove-they-were-not-human/

Mysterious Viking Sword Made With Technology From the Future?

An Ulfberht sword displayed at  the Germanisches Nationalmuseum, Nuremberg, Germany. (Martin Kraft)An Ulfberht sword displayed at the Germanisches Nationalmuseum, Nuremberg, Germany. (Martin Kraft)



The Viking sword Ulfberht was made of metal so pure it baffled archaeologists. It was thought the technology to forge such metal was not invented for another 800 or more years, during the Industrial Revolution.
About 170 Ulfberhts have been found, dating from 800 to 1,000 A.D. A NOVA, National Geographic documentary titled “Secrets of the Viking Sword” first aired in 2012 took a look at the enigmatic sword’s metallurgic composition.
In the process of forging iron, the ore must be heated to 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit to liquify, allowing the blacksmith to remove the impurities (called “slag”). Carbon is also mixed in to make the brittle iron stronger. Medieval technology did not allow iron to be heated to such a high temperature, thus the slag was removed by pounding it out, a far less effective method.
The Ulfberht, however, has almost no slag, and it has a carbon content three times that of other metals from the time. It was made of a metal called “crucible steel.” 
It was thought that the furnaces invented during the industrial revolution were the first tools for heating iron to this extent.
The difference in purity is seen by the consistency of the Ulfberht steel, almost free of slag. (Screenshot/NOVA/National Geographic)
Modern blacksmith Richard Furrer of Wisconsin spoke to NOVA about the difficulties of making such a sword. Furrer is described in the documentary as one of the few people on the planet who has the skills needed to try to reproduce the Ulfberht.
“To do it right, it is the most complicated thing I know how to make,” he said.
He commented on how the Ulfberht maker would have been regarded as possessing magical powers. “To be able to make a weapon from dirt is a pretty powerful thing,” he said. But, to make a weapon that could bend without breaking, stay so sharp, and weigh so little would be regarded as supernatural.
Furrer spent days of continuous, painstaking work forging a similar sword. He used medieval technology, though he used it in a way never before suspected. The tiniest flaw or mistake could have turned the sword into a piece of scrap metal. He seemed to declare his success at the end with more relief than joy.  
It is possible that the material and the know-how came from the Middle East. The Volga trade route between the Viking settlements and the Middle East opened at the same time the first Ulfberhts appeared and closed when the last Ulfberhts were produced.


YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

woensdag 12 februari 2014

UFOTV® Presents : ANCIENT ALIEN MYSTERY OF THE CARPATHIAN SPHINX


New studies: Conspiracy theorists sane; government dupes crazy, hostile

New studies: Conspiracy theorists sane; government dupes crazy, hostile

February 11, 2014 - Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled conspiracy theorists appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories, the study compared conspiracist (pro-conspiracy theory) and conventionalist (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.
The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist. In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: The research showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called conspiracists or conspiracy theorists.

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people dont like being called conspiracy theorists: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! The CIAs campaign to popularize the term conspiracy theory and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.

In other words, people who use the terms conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorist as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved state crimes against democracy. An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the Kennedy assassinations in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.

Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed conspiracy theory label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.

In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong confirmation bias - that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the conspiracy theory label) to avoid conflicting information.

The extreme irrationality of those who attack conspiracy theories has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled Dangerous Machinery: Conspiracy Theorist as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion, they wrote:

If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.

But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIAs 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the conspiracy theory smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous - and more rational - than anti-conspiracy ones.

No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.


Sources and more information:

The Day We Fight Back

TODAY We Fight Back Against Mass Surveillance

Dutch? ► https://www.bof.nl/2014/02/11/vandaag-is-the-day-we-fight-back/

February 11, 2014 - In January 2012 we defeated the SOPA and PIPA censorship legislation with the largest Internet protest in history. Today we face another critical threat, one that again undermines the Internet and the notion that any of us live in a genuinely free society: mass surveillance.

In celebration of the win against SOPA and PIPA two years ago, and in memory of one of its leaders, Aaron Swartz, we are planning a day of protest against mass surveillance, to take place this February 11th.
If you’re in the US: Thousands of websites will host banners urging people to call/email Congress. We’ll ask legislators to oppose the FISA Improvements Act, support the USA Freedom Act, and enact protections for non-Americans.

If you’re not in the US: Visitors will be asked to urge appropriate targets to institute privacy protections.

Here’s the press release:

A broad coalition of activist groups, companies, and online platforms will hold a worldwide day of activism in opposition to the NSA’s mass spying regime on February 11th. Dubbed “The Day We Fight Back”, the day of activism was announced on the eve of the anniversary of the tragic passing of activist and technologist Aaron Swartz. The protest is both in his honor and in celebration of the victory over theStop Online Piracy Act two years ago this month, which he helped spur.

Participants including Access, Demand Progress, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Fight for the Future, Free Press, BoingBoing, Reddit, Mozilla, ThoughtWorks, and more to come, will join potentially millions of Internet users to pressure lawmakers to end mass surveillance — of both Americans and the citizens of the whole world.

On January 11, 2013, Aaron Swartz took his own life. Aaron had a brilliant, inquisitive mind that he employed towards the ends of technology, writing, research, art, and so much more. Near the end of his life, his focus was political activism, in support of civil liberties, democracy, and economic justice.

Aaron sparked and helped guide the movement that would eventually defeat the Stop Online Piracy Act in January 2012. That bill would have destroyed the Internet as we know it, by blocking access to sites that allowed for user-generated content — the very thing that makes the Internet so dynamic.

David Segal, executive director of Demand Progress, which he co-founded with Swartz, said: “Today the greatest threat to a free Internet, and broader free society, is the National Security Agency’s mass spying regime. If Aaron were alive he’d be on the front lines, fighting back against these practices that undermine our ability to engage with each other as genuinely free human beings.” According to Roy Singham, Chairman of the global technology company ThoughtWorks, where Aaron was working up until the time of his passing:

“Aaron showed us that being a technologist in the 21st century means taking action to prevent technology from being turned against the public interest. The time is now for the global tribe of technologists to rise up together and defeat mass surveillance.”

According to Josh Levy of Free Press:

“Since the first revelations last summer, hundreds of thousands of Internet users have come together online and offline to protest the NSA’s unconstitutional surveillance programs. These programs attack our basic rights to connect and communicate in private, and strike at the foundations of democracy itself. Only a broad movement of activists, organizations and companies can convince Washington to restore these rights.”

Brett Solomon, Executive Director, Access, added:

“Aaron thought in systems. He knew that a free and open internet is a critical prerequisite to preserving our free and open societies. His spirit lives in our belief that where there are threats to this freedom, we will rise to overcome them. On February 11th, we’ll rise against mass surveillance.”

On the day of action, the coalition and the activists it represents make calls and drive emails to lawmakers. Owners of websites will install banners to encourage their visitors to fight back against surveillance, and employees of technology companies will demand that their organizations do the same. Internet users are being asked to develop memes and change their social media avatars to reflect their demands.

Websites and Internet users who want to talk part can visit TheDayWeFightBack.org to sign up for email updates and to register websites to participate. Regular updates will be posted to the site between now and the February 11th day of action.

WHAT: Day of Action in Opposition to Mass Spying, Honoring Aaron Swartz and SOPA Blackout Anniversary

WHEN: February 11, 2014

HOW INTERNET USERS CAN HELP:

Visit http://www.TheDayWeFightBack.org

Sign up to indicate that you’ll participate and receive updates.

Sign up to install widgets on websites encouraging its visitors to fight back against surveillance. (These are being finalized in coming days.)

Use the social media tools on the site to announce your participation.

Develop memes, tools, websites, and do whatever else you can to participate — and encourage others to do the same.

Sources and more information:

 The Day We Fight Back
A message from the organizers of "The Day We Fight Back": DEAR USERS OF THE INTERNET, In January 2012 we defeated the SOPA and PIPA censorship legislation with the largest Internet protest in history. Today we face another critical threat, one that again undermines the Internet and the notion that any of us live in a genuinely free society: mass...

( via disinfo.com )

Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/news/TODAY_We_Fight_Back_Against_Mass_Surveillance/99669#ixzz2t6L8PC5j

maandag 10 februari 2014

Britain's war on drugs 'unwinnable', says Nick Clegg

Deputy Prime Minister says Liberal Democrats will publish alternative strategy this year after completing study of decriminalisation in Uruguay and some US states

Nick Clegg has declared Britain is
Britain must end the "conspiracy of silence" surrounding the war on drugs, says Nick Clegg Photo: Reuters
Nick Clegg has said that the war on drugs is "unwinnable" and that Britain must end the "conspiracy of silence" surrounding the issue.
The Deputy Prime Minister said that the Liberal Democrats will publish an alternative strategy this year after completing a study of the impact of decriminalisation of marijuana in Uruguay and some US states.
Mr Clegg, while stopping short of calling for full decriminalisation, favours a health-based approach to treating drug users.
He told the BBC that for too long politicians have refused to consider alternatives to the war on drugs because it is "all too controversial".
"If you are anti-drugs, you should be pro-reform," he told the BBC.
During a visit to Colombia he said that the war on drugs has led to "terrible conflict" and cost tens of thousands of lives.
Liberal Democrat calls for a Royal Commission to investigate Britain's drug policy have been rejected by the Conservatives.
Mr Clegg told The Sun newspaper that the war on drugs is ultimately "unwinnable".

Source: Source: http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/britains-war-on-drugs-unwinnable-says-nick-clegg/

10 redenen waarom biologisch eten beter is


10 redenen waarom biologisch eten beter isPesticidenlandbouw versus biologisch landbouw. Wat is beter? Dit is een retorische vraag want vrijwel iedereen, behalve de boer die zijn boterham verdient met pesticidenlandbouw zal antwoorden dat biologische landbouw beter is voor mens en mileu. In dit artikel staan 10 argumenten gerangschikt waaruit blijkt dat pesticidenlandbouw een jammerlijke miskleun is van onze maatschappij. Het leidt tot milieuvervuiling en kanker.

1. Geen bestrijdingsmiddelen

Biologisch eten is onbespoten. Dat betekent dat je de schil van appels en aardappels kan opeten. Van regulier fruit is het uiterst ongezond om de schil op te eten. Er zitten namelijk bestrijdingsmiddelen op die je er met wassen niet vanaf krijgt. Sommige mensen wassen hun groenten en fruit met zout water. Zelfs dat biedt geen garantie. Van tomatenperenaubergines enaardbeien is bekend dat de bestrijdingsmiddelen door de schil heen gaan.

2. Meer voedingsstoffen

Als je de schil opeet gooi je minder van het fruit weg. Dat betekent dat de totale afvalberg kleiner wordt, maar dat is niet het belangrijkste voor jou persoonlijk. In en vlak onder de schil zitten vrijwel altijd de meeste voedingstoffen. Een geschilde appel is ongezonder dan een ongeschilde appel. Het feit dat je biologisch fruit zonder schillen kunt opeten zorgt er voor dat je meervitaminenmineralenfytonutriënten en aminozuren binnen krijgt. Schillen kost tijd. In een wereld waar alles om snelheid draait en waar het lijkt alsof we elke dag minder tijd hebben om dingen te doen is dit een belangrijke factor. Biologisch fruit is makkelijker om te eten. Het mag dan wel iets duurder zijn maar dit prijsverschil wordt enigszins verminderd doordat je de schil niet weg gooit waardoor 10% meer van het fruit gegeten wordt.

Biologische rode peper
Biologische rode peper

3. Biologisch is niet genetisch gemanipuleerd

Biologisch eten is niet genetisch gemanipuleerd zoals alle pesticidengewassen. Tegenwoordig worden gewassen er speciaal op gekweekt dat ze pesticiden nodig hebben om te groeien. Zonder pesticiden gaan ze gewoon dood. Een belangrijke pesticideproducent is Monsanto. Vroeger geloofden velen in het Monsantosprookje dat men gewassen kweekten waar extra vitaminen in zaten. Dat is klinkklare onzin gebleken. Men kweekt gewassen die alleen nog met behulp van Monsanto´s bestrijdingsmiddel Roundup groeien. Op Wikipedia worden dit de Roundupgewassen genoemd. Pesticidengewassen komen uiteindelijk in onze magen terecht. Wie weet wat voor Frankensteinfood onze kinderen gaan eten als deze ontwikkeling doorgaat. Dus als je geen onderdeel wilt zijn van het huidige mondiale Genetische Manipulatie-experiment wat wordt gehouden onder de mensheid, ga je naar de biologische winkel.

4. Biologisch is lekkerder

Biologisch eten is gewoon lekkerder. Misschien is dit wel de belangrijkste factor om over te stappen naar een ecologische maatschappij. Eigenlijk moet je zeggen om terug te gaan naar de ecologische maatschappij want de huidige landbouwproductie middels pesticiden bestaat nog maar kort, nog niet eens 100 jaar.

5. De werknemers worden niet aan gif bloot gesteld

Wanneer iedereen biologisch zou eten dan werken de werknemers in de fruitsector niet meer met gif. Voor de arbeidsomstandigheden is het dus beter om gifloos ecologisch fruit te eten. Nog belangrijker is het dat de landbouwgrond niet wordt verpest door gif. Daardoor wordt de hele aarde er beter. Biologisch fruit eten is beter voor het milieu. Bovendien is het beter voor de gezondheid van de boer en zijn werknemers.

100 Jaar geleden kenden we alleen biologische landbouw.

Biologische aardbei
Biologische aardbei

6. Ziektekosten dalen

Omdat biologisch fruit gezonder is, word je minder snel ziek. Dat spaart uiteindelijk op de medische zorgkosten. Wetenschappelijk onderzoek heeft aangetoond dat gebruik van bestrijdingsmiddelen ertoe leidt dat het fruit minder aminozuren, minder vitaminen en minder mineralen aanmaken. Wanneer iedereen zou overstappen op biologisch fruit dalen de kosten voor de gezondheidszorg.

7. Kosten waterwinning dalen

De industriële landbouwproductie zorgt voor veel pesticiden in het water. Deze komen uiteindelijk allemaal bij de waterleidingbedrijven terecht. Allerlei kunstgrepen moeten worden toegepast om dit pure vergif uit het water te vissen. Daar gaan hoge kosten mee gepaard. Wanneer iedereen zou overgaan op biologisch voedsel vallen deze kosten weg en kan de prijs van het drinkwater aanzienlijk omlaag.

8. Kleinschalige landbouw beter voor samenleving

Een belangrijke reden om ecologisch eten te prefereren boven pesticidengroente en -fruit is dat je kleine familiebedrijven steunt. Je geeft kleine ondernemingen een eerlijke kans. In het huidige industriële landbouwsysteem kun je alleen overleven als je op grote schaal iets verbouwt. Voor het milieu is het beter als er op een stuk land veel verschillende gewassen staan. Dit heeft als bijkomend voordeel dat de producten geen lange weg hoeven af te leggen naar de winkels. Dat bespaart weer brandstof, tijd en geld. Het is ook beter voor het milieu. Kleinschalige landbouw is op allerlei manieren beter voor de maatschappij.

Biologische aardappel
Biologische aardappel

9. Kankerepidemie kan door pesticidenlandbouw komen

Boeren die werken met pesticiden doen dat uitsluitend vanuit winstoogpunt. Hen zal het een zorg zijn als de mensen kanker krijgen van pesticiden. Het is een reële mogelijkheid dat de huidige kankerepidemie goeddeels is veroorzaakt door de pesticidenlandbouw.

10. Pesticidenlandbouw tast biodiversiteit aan

Pesticideboeren plegen monoculturen aan te leggen. Dat houdt in dat op grote schaal slechts één product gekweekt wordt. Dat is zeer slecht voor de biodiversiteit. Bovendien zorgen pesticiden ervoor dat natuurlijk voorkomende gewassen niet meer de kans krijgen om te groeien. Dat is een tweede reden waardoor de biodiversiteit wordt aangetast.

Nawoord

Wanneer overheden het serieus namen met de wereld en de problemen die winstbejag met zich meesleept dan had men allang overgestapt naar een wereld waar biologische landbouw de voorkeur heeft. Overheden zouden kunnen beginnen om geen belasting te heffen op biologische producten zodat ze even duur worden als pesticidenproducten. Dat zou kostenbesparingen opleveren in de gezondheidszorg, milieuproblematiek en waterwinning, zoals blijkt uit bovengenoemde punten. Uiteindelijk wordt iedereen daar beter van. Pesticidenlandbouw bedrijven is roofbouw plegen op de aarde. De pesticidenlandbouw wordt door de overheden overal ter wereld gesubsidieerd. De Nederlandse overheid subsidieert de pesticidenglastuinbouw.

Bron: http://mens-en-gezondheid.infonu.nl/gezonde-voeding/99050-10-redenen-waarom-biologisch-eten-beter-is.html

Zeker een derde van Brits voedsel is 'nep'

Na het paardenvleesschandaal wacht het Verenigd Koninkrijk nu ook een nepvoedselschandaal.

Foto:  AFP
Uit een grootschalige laboratoriumtest blijkt dat zeker een derde van de voedselproducten in de winkel niet bevat wat wordt beweerd of foutief is geëtiketteerd. Dat meldt The Guardian zaterdag.
Er wordt mozzarella verkocht die voor minder dan de helft uit kaas bestaat, ham op pizza's die bestaat uit gevogelte of een vleesemulsie en bevroren garnalen die voor de helft uit water bestaan, blijkt uit de laboratoriumbevindingen. Ook is er rundvlees vermengd met varkensvlees en gevogelte.
Voor de test zijn negenhonderd monsters genomen uit consumentenvoedsel dat wordt verkocht in het Engelse West Yorkshire. Experts vrezen dat de tests een weerspiegeling zijn van landelijke voedselverkoop.
De bevolking loopt mogelijk gevaar, omdat er voor overheden minder geld beschikbaar is voor controle op en analyse van voedsel.
Door: ANP

Source: http://www.nu.nl/buitenland/3696674/zeker-derde-van-brits-voedsel-nep.html

donderdag 6 februari 2014

Russian Stonehenge

http://wiarawt.com/video-photos-they-fi ... tonehenge/

In the Kemerovo region of Russia have found a giant wall consisting of several rectangular blocks of stone. Scientists compared to Stonehenge or the Egyptian pyramids.

The property, according to preliminary calculations could date back more than a hundred thousand years ago, has a height of nearly forty meters and extends about two hundred meters on a mountain Shoria sector.

Image

The wall consists of ‘bricks’ which range between 5 and 7 feet high by 20 long. Each block weighs over a thousand tons, and ensure that the expedition of these rectangular blocks are scattered on the slopes of the surrounding mountains, according to the Russian newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta ’.

Image

Scientists have two versions about the origin of ‘Russian Stonehenge’. First, it could have been built by an ancient civilization with today inaccessible technologies, since it is very difficult to explain otherwise how they managed to raise the blocks up a hill 1,200 meters above sea level.

Image

The second version suggests that these megaliths emerged as the result of geological processes associated to strong weathering of the rock of the mountain Shoria. It is known that the first shipments of geologists in these areas were conducted in 1991. According to one of the leaders of this expedition finding author Georgy Sidorov, “we saw exceeded all our expectations.” “We found a wall built with large granite blocks, some of which reach a length of 20 meters and a height of 6 meters. Interestingly, the megalithic masonry sometimes alternated with polygonal masonry. At the top of the wall , we saw traces of an ancient stone fusion. was clear to us that the structure had suffered powerful thermonuclear explosions or any other. “ After unfolding a strange cyclopean construction built vertically on a giant basement rocks appeared. They all came to the conclusion that it was an old powerhouse, because in some places the vertical plates of the capacitor had been blocked by powerful horizontal blocks. After photographing the strange buildings down to camp. It was clear to everyone that we dealt with something mysterious and very old. “ The next expedition is planned for next summer, when specialists plan to bring special equipment to help study their findings in more detail.

Texto completo en: http://actualidad.rt.com/cultura/view/1 ... -piramides





Some related links I found:
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set ... 411&type=3

http://misteryhunters.wordpress.com/tag ... of-shoria/

http://www.academia.edu/1309554/STONE_S ... reviously_
(A connection to ancient Egypt/Inca mythology?)

Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/forum/giant-megalithic-stone-structure-found-in-russia-t91058.html#ixzz2sXGVCxRO
I was just looking through the latest NASA photograph from the Mars Rover and saw an image which seems to depict a head of a statue buried in the sand. Have a look for yourself and see what I mean.

Go to the Nasa photo here: http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files ... 528-wb.jpg

The go to the right hand side of the image, about half way down from the top. Go into close up and you can see it for yourself.

You can see it here, where I have isolated it and put it up as a separate graphic:
Image

I'm not claiming it is a statue of course, but it does look very real...

Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/forum/head-of-a-statue-in-latest-nasa-mars-rover-image-t91050.html#ixzz2sWuc0Zcg

http://www.disclose.tv/forum/head-of-a-statue-in-latest-nasa-mars-rover-image-t91050.html

woensdag 5 februari 2014

Massive 60 Tons(!) Sarcophagus Discovered at Abydos.

Really huge! Team of Pennsylvania archeologists discover an huge sarcophagus of 60 tons (!) in Abydos but wasn’t able to identify its owner. Maybe, but there isn't consensus among this, Sobekhotep I Pharaoh of the nebulous and dark 13th Dynasty. 
www.thehistoryblog.com... 



The tomb was built out of limestone from the Tura quarries near Cairo and was originally topped by a pyramid, now gone. The handful of other 13th Dynasty pharaonic tombs that have been discovered are in the royal necropoli of Dashur, 25 miles south of Cairo, and Saqqara, 19 miles south of Cairo. They too were topped by pyramids, only parts of which survive.

Only one question: How "Big" the Owner was?

Source: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread996202/pg1